Postscript
Since this article was first published, some interesting news stories have come
out which strongly indicate that New York City was attacked by nuclear weapons
on 9/11/01. Here's a list:
New York City was Nuked
New York City was attacked by nuclear weapons on 9/11/01. This is
evident in the alarming rise of cancers being reported. The cancer rate is
comparable to places where nuclear bombs have been tested.
On November 28, 2006, the Village Voice published
an article on
the rise in cancer seen among 911 rescue workers. In typical
Village Voice/Pentagon style, the article hardly seems very concerned. It
begins by focusing on 'Ernie Vallebuona'. (This guy could easily be a
government spook. Sorry, but that's the world we're living in.) You have to
scroll down in the Voice article to read that over 8,000 rescue workers
claim to have illnessness that appear to be from exposure to atomic radiation.
Another website spells out
the bad news: New York city's rising cancer rate is comparable to what took
place in Hiroshima.
In addition, on his blog Wayne Madsen originally (9/12/06) reported:
...According to sources who worked with the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) at Ground Zero on and after 911, residents of
southern Manhattan and rescue and clean-up workers involved in the recovery
operations at the site of the former World Trade Center are experiencing an
unusually high rate of non-Hodgkin lymphoma -- a cancer that is common
among individuals who have been exposed to extremely high levels of
ionizing radiation, such as that from nuclear blasts and major nuclear
reactor leaks. (Wayne Madsen, 9/12/06)
Curiously, Madsen no longer provides a link from his blog to this commentary. Why
is that? It seems very likely to this reader that Madsen was instructed
to remove this comment because it is true.
Folks, it is TIME to wake up and start telling other people that
no planes struck the World Trade Center. YOUR
FUTURE is at stake if the perpetrators of 9/11 are not exposed.
Scott Loughrey
|
